Misuse of Legal Provisions by Women

Randeep Singh
4 min readOct 3, 2024

--

In today’s society, a troubling trend has emerged where legal provisions designed to protect women are being misused in marital disputes. Educated and financially independent women are increasingly using these laws as tools to extract large financial settlements from their husbands. What was meant to protect genuine victims of domestic violence and dowry harassment is now, in some cases, weaponized for personal gain, often at the expense of the husband and his entire family.

Common Allegations Misused as Weapons

Several sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and other legal protections are frequently invoked in marital discord, often inappropriately. While these laws are vital for genuine victims, they are sometimes exploited to put undue pressure on husbands and their families. Some commonly misused sections include:

  • Section 498A, IPC: Pertaining to cruelty by the husband or his relatives, including mental and physical harassment or dowry demands.
  • Section 406, IPC: Dealing with criminal breach of trust, where wives allege wrongful retention of property or dowry items.
  • Section 506, IPC: Pertaining to criminal intimidation, with claims that the husband or his family members have threatened the wife.
  • Section 377, IPC: Allegations of unnatural sex to intensify claims.
  • Domestic Violence Act: Allowing for protection orders, maintenance, and residence rights, adding further pressure to the husband.

Increasingly, these laws are used not for protection, but as tools to demand unreasonable financial settlements from husbands under the threat of prolonged legal action.

Extortion Through Family Involvement

One of the most distressing tactics in these cases is the inclusion of the husband’s extended family in the FIR. It is common for wives to name not only the husband but also his parents, siblings, and even distant relatives in allegations of cruelty. This broad inclusion increases pressure on the husband, as the prospect of a lengthy legal battle involving his family drives many men to settle financially, even when the allegations are false.

This situation resembles kidnapping for ransom: the wife uses the legal system to hold the husband’s entire family “hostage” until a large financial settlement is paid. The settlement — often in the form of alimony or maintenance — is negotiated under duress, much like a ransom demanded for the safe return of a loved one.

Legal Extortion or Ransom?

The amounts demanded in these settlements often far exceed reasonable compensation. Instead, they are aimed at maximizing financial gain, leaving husbands with little choice but to pay. The fear of a lengthy legal battle and the toll it takes on family reputation and finances forces many men to settle.

Some lawyers representing wives work on a contingency fee basis, where they receive a percentage of the settlement. This creates an incentive to push for the highest possible settlement, often at the expense of fairness. The wife, encouraged by this arrangement, may make exaggerated or false claims to maximize financial gain, knowing that her lawyer stands to benefit as well.

A Case Illustrating Legal Misuse

In one reported case, a husband found himself embroiled in a complex legal battle initiated by his wife, who had significant control over their finances. She accused him and his family of withholding her property, despite evidence to the contrary. Allegations of domestic abuse and dowry harassment were added, despite a lack of proof. The husband and his family were effectively held “hostage” by the legal system until a large financial settlement was paid. This case, like many others, demonstrates how legal provisions meant to protect can be twisted into tools for financial extortion.

The Role of the Hon’ble Supreme Court

Given the increasing misuse of these legal protections, it is vital for the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India to intervene. When false allegations are proven, there should be serious consequences for those making them. Laws meant to protect genuine victims should not be misused as tools for extortion.

If a wife’s allegations are found to be false, she should face accountability, possibly under laws related to Kidnapping or criminal conspiracy. Holding individuals accountable for filing false cases will send a strong message that the legal system cannot be exploited for personal gain. Such action would also restore the balance needed to ensure that these laws serve their true purpose: protecting those in genuine need.

Impact on Society

The misuse of these legal provisions has far-reaching consequences. Young men, observing such cases in their communities, are increasingly wary of marriage. Fear of being trapped in false allegations and long legal battles discourages many from entering into marriage, threatening the institution itself.

Moreover, children often become collateral damage. They are caught in the crossfire of legal disputes, losing the opportunity to grow up in a stable, loving environment. A reduction in the misuse of these laws would help protect children, ensuring they receive love and care from both parents.

Conclusion

While laws like Section 498A and the Domestic Violence Act are essential for protecting women from genuine abuse, their misuse is a growing concern. Educated and financially independent women have, in some cases, used these provisions as tools for extortion, demanding unreasonable sums of money from their husbands under the threat of false allegations.

The Hon’ble Supreme Court must act to curb this misuse of the legal system. If false allegations are proven, those responsible should be held accountable under the law, ensuring that legal provisions are not exploited for financial gain. By doing so, the judiciary can restore balance to the legal system and protect the sanctity of marriage.

This would not only save the courts’ time but also prevent unnecessary family breakdowns. Many women, misguided by legal advice or external influences, may fall into the trap of using these laws for financial gain. By addressing this misuse, many families could be preserved, and children could grow up in more secure and loving environments.

--

--

Randeep Singh
Randeep Singh

No responses yet